영어황분들 도와주세요
게시글 주소: https://ebsi.orbi.kr/00069601347
이 글 전체적인 조언좀요
논리성, 개연성, 가독성 등등등...
Humanity made itself livestock
The pursuit of freedom has not gotten over but hidden the oppressions
"Wake up in the morning, eat breakfast, take a bus, go to work, work hard, eat lunch, go home, watch TV, be sad, just sleep"
We are deceived to believe those commands as our own choices
We are fool who find this society better than any time.
Dialectical processes are not a path to the absolute but constant regressions
Syntheses have never transcended but only concealed contradictions
Marx successfully criticized the Hegel's idealism, but failed to address the absurdity of assumption on the convergence of aufhebens, which can be improved by negative dialectics. History can progress in any unexpected ways, not like as in Marxist or Hegelian optimistic and convergent historicism.
It is essential to be careful of any potential dogmatism, but not giving up the pursuit for rationality, as it is another form of uniformization stemming from post-modernism.
Social democracy, which Marx wouldn't have predicted at all, is opium that conceals and fails to address the inherent flaws of capitalism. Minimal wage leads to the deception that people are not exploited. Labor unions have already been polluted by the bourgeoisie. Welfare are done by exploiting involuntary workers using taxes stolen from citizens. Currency is a tool to justify exploitation by commodifying labor. The flaws will persist in any forms unless we take an action. Physical violence cannot solve but repeat the absurdities as it becomes another static dogmatism. Without violence, however, nothing fundamentally changes. We could approach this dilemma by materialistically analyzing the societal structures, where the demanded gain power while others lose. We should replace industries with voluntary units outside monetary logic or governmental influences to be independent and demand nothing from them. This non-physical yet materialistically powerful 'violence' can weaken the traditional power structures.
We can begin in the digital realm, where capitalistic dogmas have not yet spread too much and a small amount of labor yields infinite quantity of products. We should minimize the use of priced software in favor of fostering open source products. Then we spread this system to the industries of basic needs such as foods or clothes. Churches and mosques would be our powerful allies beyond religious ideologies. Religion is no more opium but a supporter. Believers reject any oppressors for the sake of the transcendent absolute - which I don't find necessary though - helpful for the transition. More and more people will be motivated to work for no payment with such free services, expanding the extent of decentralized society. The demanded gain power, the ignored lose power. We should be independent of the status quo by minimizing our demand on it.
People already have experiences working without payment, not even knowing that it's a labor: Cooking, cleaning, childcare, open source programming, creating videos, writing music, collecting garbage outside, and so on. Our nature does not distinguish leisure and labor. We humans used to work when we recognize societal needs, are willing to realizing ourselves, or even just want to have some fun. Feudalism and capitalism historically distorted our intrinsic nature.
LET THERE BE NO MORE STATES OR FIRMS
FROM THE ABILITIES TO THE NEEDS
It is however crucial to note that the vision works only in a society with highly developed technology where labor yields an exponential amount of production, enough to prevent a
lack of supply. We should thus retain from practicing it in developing countries, as it could lead to severe societal chaos. Advocating changes need thoughtful contemplation of materialistic and dialectical history of humanity.
We cannot help but accept that capitalistic system has accomplished impressive steps in terms of quantitative realms, developing numerous fields governed by instrumental reason. This generated a way for humanity to be free, but it was also the lack of critical reason shadowed by conservative ideologies such as social democracy and revised capitalism who led us to dismiss the very way it made.
글을 쓰는 시도는 해봤는데... 가독성 많이 떨어지나요??
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
근데 이번 9평이 쉬웠는데 그게 판단이 되나용? 어차피 상대평가이니까 예를 들어...
-
수1 수2 미적은 걍 ㅈㄴ 어려운 거 알고 있고.
-
여러분의 의견을 듣고 싶습니다
-
우리 든든한 교사 킬러 감시단이 있는데 뭐가 걱정임? 교수들이 아무리 머리 싸매고...
-
드릴4 vs 이해원 시즌 1 vs 이해원 시즌 2 vs 설맞이 난이도 순서가...
-
절대 아니다 게이들아 평가원은 항상 교육과정 내에서 성실히 수행하면 다 풀 수 있게...
-
기하 작년 9평 12
작년 9평 때 난이도 딱 적절하게 나와서 표준점수 1점 차이났는데 올해 수능도 제발...
-
메인에 있던건데 서바이벌이 저렇게 위에 있음? 수학은 거의 서바밖에 안풀어봐서...
-
- 국어: 6평보다는 쉽고 9평보다는 어려운 난이도, 2021 수능, 2022...
-
9평 수학. 1
미적 30틀 96 집모의 70분 걸림. 7번 Sn-1을 표현하는 방식이 살짝...
-
국영 17수능 난이도 + 수학 20수능 난이도 + 탐구 18수능 난이도 국어: 화작...
-
어그로 죄송합니다 이해원이 쉬운 교재인가요?? 사람들이 그렇게까지 어렵다고는 안하는...
-
부제: 오징어게임 1번째 게임: 국어 [제한시간 80분, 8시 40분 - 10시]...
-
어느 쌤 수업이 더 어렵나요? 하위권이라.. 너무 어려우면 수업을 못 따라가서;
-
두개다 현장응시하신분 없나요 저는 15 16수능 A형 응시자인데 처음에 17수능...
-
여러분은 이번 수능 (문과) 수학이 어떻게 나올거같나요? 통수치며 불? 아니면 이대로 물?
-
문제는 위와 같고요. 밑에 게시글이 있는데, 제 의도가 잘 전달이 안된것 같아 다시...
-
사범대 면접들 다 어떠셨음?? 친구가 이번에 질문이 먼가 어려웠다라고 하길래 ㅎㅎ
-
1999 (1명: 오승은 / 서울대 물리학과) 2000 (1명: 박혜진 / 서울대...
-
애초에 수능시험자체가 교육과정을 토대로 사고력을 측정하는 시험인데 난이도가 어떻든...
이야 이거 과연 댓글 달릴까
넹???